From: http://antijohnkerry.blogspot.com/

E-mail from the opposition 
Yes, as I have stated in the past, we welcome opposing views here. We are not like those smelly liberals, who love free speech only when it agrees with them. J.S. sends this along: (my retorts are in bold)
Honestly? You want Bush to be reelected? (Yes, very much so)
(This is not hate mail. Why not publish this on your
site so you can respond? Or do you only publish
pro-Bush accounts? (We publish anything and everything))
Let's look at Bush's terrorism credentials. Since 9/11, Bush's government has failed to capture Osama bin Laden (So? Osama is either dead or living in a cave. Not much of a life now, is it?)or disassemble is [sic]organization. [True, but a hell of a lot of them are with Allah right now, aren't they? Gotta start somewhere.]What it has done is (1) push through the Patriot Act, [Thankfully so. Have you even read the thing? Even Kerry has stopped bashing the Patriot Act due to its high approval outside the ACLU and blame-America first liberals. You need to see the updated Dem talking points.) (2) invade Afghanistan, a good idea badly managed, (Huh? How exactly is that?)then (3)invade Iraq, for reasons all that have turned out to be false. (Oh, you mean the reasons supplied by Joe Wilson and Richard Clarke? What Bush said is no different that what Kerry, Clinton, Gore, Kennedy, Levin, et al said before him. The only difference is that Bush had the balls to do something about it. Go read the Iraq Liberation Act and the 1998 bin Laden indictment, for starters.)Indeed, it turns out Iraq had nothing to do
with terrorism at all (Other than Abbas and some of the other terrorists we found there after we invaded, right? When top al-Qaeda member al-Zarqawi was injured in Afghanistan, where did he go for treatment, and to have his leg amputated? He went straight to Baghdad. Do you even know who he is? Also, where did the 1993 WTC bombers go to right after blowing up that truck. That's right. Baghdad.), and that Bush, Cheney and Rummy had been planning to invade Iraq all along, merely hijacking 9/11 and the nation's grief for its benefit. (What benefit is that? Bush has taken nothing but grief for his determined response) As Rummy's memo said regarding 9/11 days afterward: "How can we tie this to SH [Saddam Hussein]?" (What memo is this? Send the link. I am sure you twisted it somehow. He probably asked if Iraq was involved, as he should have)And,
having declared war on a completely irrelevant country, with no WMD, with no terrorists, Iraq has fallen into utter chaos, (Not so, pal. Read something other than the New York Times once in a while. My cousin is there and I get first-hand accounts.)and has become a breeding ground - and a new recruitment area - for terrorists. (Sure, because unlike unrealistic people like you, they are fully aware that the battleground for their own survial is there. It isn't like these guys were docile goat herders before hand.) Bush's incompetence is destructive, even beneficial to terrorists. 10/10 terrorists want him to stay, I promise. (That is the latest spin on the undeniable truth that terrorists want Kerry to win.)
Economically, then. The economy is growing (not in jobs, though), but ANY economy would grow with the stimulus the U.S. government is providing, piling its own cash into it, and creating soaring deficits. (Wait a second. I thought this was the worst economy since Herbert Hoover? Now things are good, but they would have been good no matter who was in? Make up your mind.) Because of all the red ink, the Admininstration is not only royally screwed, but the recovery, if not properly managed from now, risks running out of air as interest rates rise. (Gee, they have nowhere to go but up, considering that have been so damn low for the past few years.) Not healthy. (Yeah, and increasing taxes will fix everything, I'm sure.)
And don't forget Enron, that massive corporate fraud run by Bush's professed friend, "Kenny Boy" (as he calls him). What a leader. (Yeah, a leader who thinks nothing of prosecuting his friend. Where else in the world does that happen? Perhaps you should take a look at the pictures of Clinton playing golf with Lay. By the way, who was running the show when Enron was pulling their crap? That's right, Clinton.) And Ashcroft settled with Microsoft, and now they are performing exactly the same anticompetitive practices as before. What else?
Well, the constitution has been raped. Everything except the Second Amendment has been waved on the grounds of national security. Sad that when under attack, Bush's America would choose to sabotage its defining freedoms to "fight terrorism" rather than reassert itself. (Oh please. Not one thing has changed for anyone except potential terrorists. And stop listening to the ACLU. They are the ones using scare tactics to help increase their membership.)
As for Europe. I can't say France has been the U.S.'s friend much in the past few years anyway, but they were right when they said before Gulf War II that changing the world required a lot more subtlety and respect than raw military power (Gaddafi would disagree) could provide. (Of course, because they don't have any military power. Perhaps you should read "Of Paradise and Power" by Robert Kagan to learn something. It is only about 100 pages, an easy read. And, read "The French Betrayal of America" by Kenneth Timmerman too. Iraq was France's cash cow for a long time, and for Chirac personally. Fuck France and Fuck Chirac.) But that said, it was pointless for the Administration and the Pentagon to insult Europe ("That's old Europe"), like a sulking child, because it wouldn't do what America said. (Read Kagan)
What an utter mess. (If you were refering to the Democratci Party, you be 100% correct)
I doubt Kerry will fix all the damage the Republicans in the White House have created, but with some luck, the new Administration will stop wrecking things, not
give tax cuts to the rich (Stop it.)during the biggest deficit in history, not look out soley for corporate interests while the health system for normal people is nonexistant (Yeah, if you love the service you get at the post office and the DMV, just wait until the government controls health care. No thanks. I'll get my own.) and the education system nearing that. (Whose fault is that? Bush has spent more money on education that anyone in history. And, who wrote most of "No Child Left Behind?" Ted Kennedy did. I'll bet you didn't know that.) The first, if not the last, step to improve the country is to take these aristocrats out of government. (Oh, and Kerry is a man of the people? Sure he is. Many of us went to Swiss boarding schools and married several insanely rich women.)
Oh, one last thing. I read that letter on your site that says how Kerry or someone rang them on their cell and they consider this intrusive. You do realize that under the Patriot Act, government agencies can tap your phone or search your house without a court order, without probable cause and without you even knowing? Is that not intrusive? (Gee, other than that being pure bullshit, I don't how to respond. Read Section 223 of the Patriot Act. It allows you to bring a lawsuit if your rights are violated under the Patriot Act. How many have lawsuits have been brought forth by it? ZERO!) Vote Democrat - there's nothing better. (WOW!! A stunning endorsement of your party!!)
Finally, I'd like to leave you with a quote from your site that speaks for its own absurdity:
" As the Democratic party has drifted further and further left, many have speculated that it was only a matter of time before they became indistinguishable from our old enemies the Communists." (Hmmm. Other than Kerry using a slogan from the known-Communist Langston Hughes and Hillary Clinton, talking about taking things from us for the common good, I wonder where we ever got an idea like that.)
My friend, for all that writing, you still were unable to come up with one solid reason for anyone to vote for Kerry. It's all anti-Bush. I challenge you, and every other Kerry supporter for that matter, to give us a one solid reason to vote for Kerry on his own merits, without a single mention of Bush. I'd love to hear it. Hell, I'd just like to know where he stands on Iraq. I still don't know.